Three isomers. If we
consider any one of the ligands as reference ( say Py), the arrangement of other three ligands ( NH3, Br
and Cl‑ ) with respect to (Py) gives three geometrical
isomers.
(a) coordination isomers
(b) no isomerism ( different
molecular formula)
(c) ← NCS , ← SCN coordinating atom
differs : linkage isomers
Option (a) and (b) –
geometrical isomerism is possible
Option (c) – ionization
isomerism is possible
Option (d) – no
possibility to show either constitutional isomerism or stereo isomerism
(a) Fe2+
(b) Fe3+
(c) Fe0
(a) Zn2+ (d10
⟹
diamagnetic)
(b) Co3+ (d6
Low spin ⟹ t2g6, eg0
diamagnetic)
(c) Ni2+ (d8
Low spin ⟹ t2g6, eg2
paramagnetic)
(d) [Ni(CN)4]2-
(dsp2 ; square planar, diamagnetic)
V2+ ( t2g3, eg0 ; CFSE =
3 x (-0.4)Δ0 = -1.2 Δ0)
Ti2+ ( t2g2, eg0 ; CFSE =
2 x (-0.4)Δ0 = -0.8 Δ0)
Statements given in
option (a) ,(b), and (c) are wrong.
The current statements
are
(a) since, the crystal
field stabilization is more in octahedral field , octahedral complexes are more
stable than square planar complexes.
(b)